2 Jurors in Alec Baldwin’s ‘Rust’ Case Communicate Out After Dismissal

Two jurors concerned in Alec Baldwin‘s Rust case that was dropped final week are talking out.

In a dialog with The New York Occasions, jurors Gabriela Picayo and Johanna Haag expressed their doubts within the prosecution’s case towards the 30 Rock alum, 66. (If the case hadn’t been dismissed — which was a results of Baldwin’s protection attorneys arguing that the prosecution had buried proof — all 12 jurors would have needed to come to a unanimous resolution on the decision.)

Baldwin’s felony cost was in the end dropped on July 12, practically three years after Rust cinematographer Halyna Hutchins was killed when the gun he was holding discharged on set in October 2021. Director Joel Souza was additionally injured.

“Because the week glided by, it simply didn’t, it didn’t look like a really sturdy case,” Haag, who works within the promoting and advertising and marketing subject and was often known as juror No. 7, advised the Occasions.

Particularly, Haag recalled the prosecution exhibiting the jury emotional legislation enforcement footage of the taking pictures aftermath. As she defined, Baldwin “appeared shocked and surprised and so unhappy.”

“It was clearly an accident, and the concept that there’s something purposeful, or the concept that there was this grave carelessness that prompted this, didn’t appear lifelike to me,” Haag mentioned.

Equally, Picayo — a scientist who served as juror No. 9 — advised the Occasions that as an actor, Baldwin mustn’t have been anticipated to know rather a lot about gun security, including he as a substitute ought to have trusted the consultants on set.

“I believe he would have trusted the folks, , on the set to do their job,” she mentioned.

Picayo additionally mirrored on discovering out that Rust armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed was already convicted of involuntary manslaughter. “I’m nonetheless right here, I’m nonetheless open to listening to and clearly attempting to remain unbiased,” she mentioned, “however I used to be beginning to transfer in the direction of the path of considering that this was very foolish and he shouldn’t be on trial.”

Nonetheless, whereas she leaned towards convicting Baldwin after the trial’s second day, she famous that she “wasn’t introduced with all the proof, so I don’t know what might have swayed me.”

In the end, the jury didn’t have to decide within the case, because it was dismissed after Baldwin’s lawyer Luke Nikas mentioned that “important” proof — ammunition found by a person named Troy Teske (a good friend of the daddy of the convicted Rust armorer) — “was by no means disclosed to us.”

“At that time, I actually began to really feel sorry for Mr. Baldwin,” Haag mentioned. “I assumed, , ‘What’s occurring right here? What is going on?’ ”

The Occasions reported that jurors came upon the case was dismissed solely after they have been despatched house, and once they obtained a textual content from the courtroom studying “Path CANCELLED” (with the phrase “trial” misspelled).

By no means miss a narrative — join PEOPLE’s free each day publication to remain up-to-date on the very best of what PEOPLE has to supply, from superstar information to driving human curiosity tales.

Baldwin spoke out a day after the dramatic dismissal, writing in an Instagram caption that there have been “too many individuals who’ve supported me to thank simply now.”

“To all of you, you’ll by no means understand how a lot I admire your kindness towards my household,” he wrote.