This text was produced for ProPublica’s Native Reporting Community in partnership with Excessive Nation Information. Join Dispatches to get tales like this one as quickly as they’re printed.
When Yakama Nation leaders discovered in 2017 of a plan to tunnel by means of a few of their ancestral land for a inexperienced power improvement, they have been caught off guard.
Whereas the tribal nation had come out in favor of climate-friendly tasks, this one appeared poised to break Pushpum, a privately owned ridgeline overlooking the Columbia River in Washington. The nation holds treaty rights to collect conventional meals there, and tribal officers knew they needed to cease the challenge.
Issues arose when the Federal Vitality Regulatory Fee, the company in control of allowing hydro power tasks, supplied the Yakama Nation what tribal leaders thought of an unattainable selection: disclose confidential ceremonial, archaeological and cultural data, or waive the best to seek the advice of on whether or not and the way the location is developed.
This put the Yakama Nation in a bind. Disclosing precisely what made the land sacred risked revealing to outsiders what they treasured most about it. Prior to now, disclosure of details about the whole lot from meals to archaeological websites enabled non-Natives to loot or in any other case desecrate the land.
Even now, tribal leaders battle to securely specific what the Pushpum challenge threatens. “I don’t understand how in-depth I can go,” stated Elaine Harvey, a tribal member and former environmental coordinator for the tribal fisheries division, when requested concerning the meals and medicines that develop on the land.
“It gives for us,” echoed Yakama Nation Councilmember Jeremy Takala. “Typically we do get actually protecting.”
Though authorities companies have typically taken vital steps to guard tribal confidentiality, that didn’t occur with the Pushpum proposal, generally known as the Goldendale Vitality Storage Venture. Tribal leaders repeatedly objected, telling the company that if a tribal nation deems a spot sacred, they shouldn’t have to interrupt confidentiality to show it — a place supported by state company leaders and, new reporting reveals, a minimum of one different federal company.
Nonetheless, after seven years, in February FERC moved the challenge ahead with out consulting with the Yakama Nation.
The method generally known as session is commonly fraught. Federal legal guidelines and company guidelines require that tribes be capable to weigh in on selections that have an effect on their treaty lands. However in follow, session procedures typically drive tribes to disclose info that makes them extra susceptible, with out providing any assured profit.
The dangers of disclosure will not be hypothetical: Looting and vandalism are widespread when details about Indigenous assets turns into public. One necessary mid-Columbia petroglyph, referred to as Tsagaglalal, or She Who Watches, needed to be faraway from its unique website due to vandalism. And leisure and business pickers have flooded one in all Washington’s greatest huckleberry selecting areas, referred to as Indian Heaven Wilderness, pushing out Native households attempting to fill up for the winter.
The Yakama Nation feared related outcomes if it absolutely participated in FERC’s session course of over the Goldendale improvement. However there are alternate options. The United Nations acknowledges Indigenous peoples’ proper to affirmatively consent to improvement on their sacred lands. An analogous mannequin was included in state laws in Washington three years in the past, however Gov. Jay Inslee vetoed it.
The necessities of the session course of are poorly outlined, and state and federal companies interpret them in a broad vary of how. Within the case of Pushpum, critics say that has allowed FERC to miss tribal issues.
“They’re simply being completely disregarded,” stated Simone Anter, an lawyer on the environmental nonprofit Columbia Riverkeeper and a descendant of the Pascua Yaqui and Jicarilla Apache nations. “What FERC is doing is so blatantly, blatantly fallacious.”
Credit score:
Picture illustration by J.D. Reeves. Portraits by Leah Nash, Jurgen Hess/Columbia Perception, and Steven Patenaude. Map by way of the U.S. Geological Survey. Paperwork by way of the Federal Vitality Regulatory Fee.
The Yakama Nation has been outspoken in its assist for renewable power improvement, together with photo voltaic and small-scale hydro tasks. However not at Pushpum; it’s sacred to the Kah-milt-pah folks, one of many bands inside the Yakama Nation, who nonetheless commonly use the location.
The proposal would remodel this space right into a facility supposed to retailer renewable power in a low-carbon means. Rye Growth, a Florida-based firm, submitted an software for permits for a “pumped hydro” system, the place a pair of reservoirs related by a tunnel retailer power for future use.
FERC has supplied few lodging for the Yakama Nation on the Goldendale challenge.
FERC spokesperson Celeste Miller advised Excessive Nation Information and ProPublica in an electronic mail that “we are going to work to deal with the results of proposed tasks on Tribal rights and assets to the best extent we will, according to federal regulation and rules. This can be a pending matter earlier than the Fee, so we can not focus on the deserves of this continuing.”
“FERC legally doesn’t need to do very a lot right here,” stated Kevin Washburn, a dean of the College of Iowa School of Legislation, a citizen of the Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma and a former assistant secretary of Indian affairs on the Division of the Inside. “Session is designed to open the door so tribes can get within the door to speak to decision-makers.” Based on specialists, the method can vary from collaborative planning that addresses tribal issues to a perfunctory dialogue with minimal impacts, relying on the company.
“That is the issue with session and its lack of tooth,” stated Anter. “If the federal authorities is saying, ‘Hey, we consulted, examine that field,’ who’s to say they did not?”
There’s one other drawback with session, too: Any discussions with a federal entity are topic to public disclosure. That’s good for presidency transparency, Washburn stated, however it may make tribal nations much more susceptible. “And it’s why tribes are proper to be cautious in what they share with feds,” he stated.
That’s an impediment at Pushpum. Issues turned even tougher there in August 2021, when FERC notified the Yakama Nation that federal session could be carried out not by the company itself, however by the developer. The Yakama Nation pushed again, asserting its treaty rights to barter as a sovereign nation solely with one other nation, not with a non-public entity. FERC, nonetheless, insisted that designating a 3rd celebration was “commonplace follow.” The Nationwide Historic Preservation Act, signed into regulation in 1966, says an company “could authorize an applicant or group of candidates to provoke session,” however maintains that the federal company remains to be “chargeable for their authorities to authorities relationships with Indian tribes.”
The Yakama Nation additionally anxious about fee guidelines that require something the tribal nation says to FERC be shared with the developer. “It will get very delicate after we share these sorts of tales,” stated Takala, the tribal councilmember. “We simply don’t share to anybody, particularly a developer.”
Some say FERC may change that inside rule, because it isn’t required by regulation. “For them to quote their very own rules and be like, ‘Our palms are tied,’ is ridiculous,” Anter stated. For months, FERC and the Yakama Nation went backwards and forwards over the situations below which the tribal authorities would share delicate info, with the Yakama Nation repeatedly asking to share info solely with FERC.
That is the issue with session and its lack of tooth. … If the federal authorities is saying, ‘Hey, we consulted, examine that field,’ who’s to say they didn’t?
In the end, FERC proposed 4 methods the Yakama Nation may take part in session. Within the eyes of tribal leaders, all these choices both posed vital dangers to the privateness of their info or rendered session meaningless.
The primary three have been specified by a letter from Vince Yearick, director of FERC’s division of hydropower licensing, despatched on Dec. 9, 2021. For possibility one, it advised the tribal nation request nondisclosure agreements from anybody accessing delicate info. Yearick didn’t specify whether or not FERC could be chargeable for issuing or imposing these NDAs.
Delano Saluskin, then-chair of the Yakama Nation, referred to as this selection “removed from the necessities of NHPA or in keeping with the belief accountability that the Federal Company has to Yakama Nation,” citing FERC insurance policies and Nationwide Historic Preservation Act regulation in a February 2022 letter to state and federal authorities officers requesting assist. He added that it “describes a course of that doesn’t defend info that’s sacred and delicate from disclosure.”
Alternatively, FERC stated, the Yakama Nation may merely redact any delicate info from paperwork it filed. This selection, nonetheless, would go away FERC at the hours of darkness concerning the particulars of what cultural assets the challenge would imperil. That might make it tougher for FERC to require challenge changes or weigh the particular impacts in its choice about whether or not to allow development.
Third, the Yakama Nation may withhold delicate info altogether, which might current related issues.
Lastly, in a June 2022 follow-up letter, the fee advised that the Yakama Nation submit a doc “with extra particulars concerning the assets of concern” and a request that among the info be handled as privileged or withheld from public disclosure.
General, Saluskin described FERC’s choices as a “failure” to conduct authorized session in good religion.
A federal company equally raised issues: In Might 2023, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, which advises the president and the Congress on defending historic properties throughout the nation, wrote to FERC suggesting that it “present the Tribes with alternatives to share info that will likely be stored confidential.” FERC’s rule concerning disclosure, the council stated, may insulate the company from significant session, “and because of this from any actual understanding of the character and significance of properties of non secular and cultural significance for Tribes.”
The issues over FERC’s engagement with the Yakama Nation are a part of a wider dialogue of whether or not and the way the U.S. authorities ought to defend tribal privateness and cultural assets. Talking at a tribal power summit in Tacoma in June 2023, Allyson Brooks, Washington’s state historic preservation officer, stated that regardless that the consent language was vetoed by the governor, state regulation for safeguarding confidentiality round tribal cultural properties remains to be stronger than federal regulation, which solely protects confidentiality if a website is eligible for the Nationwide Register of Historic Locations.
In Washington, if a tribal historic preservation officer says, “‘X marks the spot; that is sacred,’ we are saying, ‘OK,’” Brooks declared. She stated asking tribal nations to show a website’s sacredness is like asking to see a photograph of child Jesus earlier than accepting the sanctity of Christmas. “You don’t. You say ‘good tree’ and take it at face worth. When tribes say ‘X is sacred,’ you need to take that at face worth too.”
That strategy is important to the Yakama Nation, which not too long ago noticed a developer concerned with a challenge proposed in close by Benton County leak info that the nation believed was personal.
We don’t write it, you gained’t see it posted. You gained’t see it in books. It’s our oral historical past. It’s sacred.
The Horse Heaven Hills wind farm could be the most important power improvement of any form in Washington state historical past. However the sprawling 72,000-acre challenge overlaps with nesting habitat for migratory ferruginous hawks, a raptor state-listed as endangered.
Courtroom paperwork associated to the allowing proceedings present that the Yakama Nation believed it had recognized the places of the ferruginous hawks’ nests as confidential, partly as a result of the hawks are ceremonially necessary. In Might 2023, the Yakama Nation requested a protecting order from the Vitality Facility Website Analysis Council, a state-level analog of FERC. The order, which the council issued, instructed all events to signal a confidentiality settlement earlier than accessing confidential info, much like the nondisclosure agreements FERC proposed. If any celebration disclosed that info, they could possibly be answerable for damages.
However the order didn’t cease that info from getting out. In February 2024, the Seattle Instances printed a narrative on the Horse Heaven Hills wind farm, which included a map of ferruginous hawk nests — a map that was credited to Scout Clear Vitality, the developer.
The Yakama Nation shortly filed a movement to implement the protecting order, alleging that Scout Clear Vitality had transgressed by passing protected cultural info to the press.
The developer counter-filed, claiming that even when nest places have been part of confidentiality dialogue, the map itself was not, and that it was so imprecise that the vital particulars remained confidential. The council in the end agreed.
Regardless of the dangers, Washburn stated that tribes ought to take any alternative to share their tales with federal officers, even when the situations aren’t excellent. “I wouldn’t essentially encourage tribes to present their deepest, darkest secrets and techniques to a federal company,” he stated. “However I’d encourage them to fulfill with FERC and attempt to give FERC a first-person account of why they suppose that is necessary.”
Not all specialists agree. Brett Lee Shelton, a member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe and an lawyer on the Native American Rights Fund, stated FERC is out of step with different federal and state companies. “It’s arduous to imagine that it’s something however disingenuous, utilizing that tactic,” he stated. “It’s fairly well-known by any company officers who cope with Indian tribes that typically sure specifics about sacred locations want to stay confidential.”
And for Bronsco Jim, a religious chief of the Kah-milt-pah folks, sharing too many particulars is out of the query. Cultural specifics keep inside the oral teachings of the longhouse, the location of the Kah-milt-pah religious group. Jim stated he doesn’t even know tips on how to translate the entire info into English. “We don’t write it, you gained’t see it posted. You gained’t see it in books. It’s our oral historical past. It’s sacred.”
