Opinion | ‘Is the Destruction the Level?’: Three Opinion Writers on Trump’s First 50 Days

This transcript was created utilizing speech recognition software program. Whereas it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it could include errors. Please evaluation the episode audio earlier than quoting from this transcript and e mail transcripts@nytimes.com with any questions.

I’m Patrick Healy, deputy editor of “New York Instances” Opinion. And that is “The First 100 Days,” a weekly collection inspecting President Trump’s use of energy and his drive to alter America.

OK, so we’re now midway by way of Trump’s first 100. The onslaught of government orders, government pardons, government muscle flexing to fireside anybody Trump desires and shut businesses. We’re seeing an unprecedented use of the phrase “unprecedented.” And this week, we’re seeing a president who promised a golden age of financial development really steering America towards a recession along with his chaotic tariff insurance policies.

It’s generally laborious to seek out the language to satisfy the second, so I wished to speak to 2 of my colleagues, opinion columnist Michelle Goldberg, and opinion contributor Frank Bruni, to attempt to make sense of all of it. Michelle Goldberg, Frank Bruni, thanks for being right here.

Patrick, thanks.

Nice to be with you, Patrick.

So since we’re on the midway mark by way of 100 days, I’d love to listen to from every of you about a difficulty or particular person or second that you just suppose defines how Trump has used energy throughout these first 50 days. Michelle, do you need to begin?

Certain. I imply, there’s a couple of, however one which stands out for me is the gutting of USAID, each as a result of it’s unlawful, it’s so flagrantly immoral, and so completely self-destructive.

Throughout the first Trump time period, I’d generally need to catch myself as a result of though I believed and suppose that Trump is uniquely despicable and harmful, the actual fact stays that if you happen to simply need to have a look at the lives misplaced and world harm performed, George W. Bush actually outstripped him.

Trump was possibly a worse particular person, however the harm that he did was way more contained to america. And I believe that within the second Trump time period, he’s modified that in a short time, not simply by taking America’s smooth energy in all kinds of the way and setting it on fireplace, however actually making these abrupt selections which can be going to kill a whole bunch of hundreds, possibly greater than one million folks and doing it on this extremely arbitrary, careless method.

And I simply need to say one thing actually fast earlier than we get to Frank. I’ve a 12-year-old son who, as he learns extra about varied darkish chapters in American historical past, can get actually down on this nation. And so I discover myself typically within the unusual place of making an attempt to speak up American greatness, as a result of I don’t need him to really feel despair concerning the nation that he’s rising up in.

And it’s occurred to me that each single factor that I’ve identified to him as an indication of American greatness or goodness, whether or not that be overseas help, whether or not that be our help for Ukraine, our success in welcoming immigrants and refugees, our scientific preeminence — every little thing that I believed was greatest about America, Trump has both destroyed or tried to destroy in lower than two months.

It’s actually attention-grabbing to listen to Michelle discuss that as a result of I don’t have kids, and I really feel a lot despair and worry and heartache about what’s happening. And I typically do surprise, what do you say to kids presently? How do you preserve their optimism and their perception that they do dwell in a particular nation? In order that’s fascinating for me to listen to.

The 2 issues that stand out to me are associated. And so they need to do with a tradition of intimidation that President Trump has created. Amongst all that’s occurred, these seem to be the clearest child steps or not even child steps in direction of one thing like autocracy.

I consider what occurred on day one. And I fear that as a result of it occurred on day one, in such a blizzard of exercise, that it’s gotten misplaced. However granting pardons, clemency of varied varieties to the 1,500, 1,600 defendants within the January 6 instances, that was a rare and chilling, chilling factor.

And what it mentioned to those that would help him or who steadfastly help him is there shall be a reward to being on Crew Trump. And on the identical time, one other factor that’s been forgotten, I believe, an excessive amount of, is his withdrawal of the safety particulars from Mike Pompeo, from John Bolton, and from a couple of others. These had been individuals who had been going through credible demise threats from Iran due to their service to america.

Due to their service to Donald Trump.

Appropriate. And that was so extraordinary. I keep in mind I used to be right here at Duke, the place I educate. Maggie Haberman got here right down to do a panel. And once I requested her the query, what has shocked you, the one factor that had actually shocked her, she mentioned, and had chilled her to the bone, was that, was the withdrawal of the safety particulars as a result of it was such an train of brute energy.

However I point out these two issues as a result of they’re entwined, and it’s a couple of system of rewards and punishments that claims, if you happen to countermand me, if you happen to contradict me, if you happen to converse towards me, there shall be penalties. However if you happen to go together with me, if you happen to do as I please, there shall be rewards.

Michelle, makes me consider your nice column this week about what’s taking place at Columbia College. I imply, listening to Frank, additionally excited about your level about USAID, are People solely protected if we’re on Donald Trump’s facet?

So I believe that there’s most likely a scale of publicity. And I believe that the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, who was a frontrunner within the Columbia protests towards Israel final yr — he’s somebody who — he has a inexperienced card. He’s married to an American. He’s anticipating a child quickly.

The concept that somebody may be taken away arbitrarily, it definitely signifies that folks with inexperienced playing cards, of whom there’s about 13 million, have fewer protections than they did a couple of months in the past as a result of till very lately, it was settled legislation that if you happen to had been contained in the nation — and significantly if you happen to had been any individual who had a inexperienced card — you had the identical constitutional protections as Americans.

That’s clearly not the case. And so that you may suppose, properly, I’m protected as a result of I’m an American citizen. However I believe that what this exhibits is {that a} authorities that’s this keen to disregard free-speech protections for one group clearly can’t be counted on to uphold them for the remainder of us.

Frank, do you suppose that Trump really cares about any of this destruction that he’s endeavor, or is the destruction the purpose? By which I imply, I’m unsure if Donald Trump actually cares about overseas help and smooth energy. And I’m unsure he actually cares if he’s placing John Bolton in danger or not.

I really feel like he left the primary time period and entered the second time period eager to be a doer. It’s the motion that’s the factor.

I couldn’t agree with you extra. I don’t suppose he has a coherent worth construction, as most of us perceive it. And I believe we’re seeing a president who’s working with out something any of us would acknowledge as a conscience, really.

It’s about exhibiting what he can get away with. It’s about exhibiting his enemies what that they supported, he can tear down. It’s all a couple of show of brute power. He will get off on that. And in that sense, it appears not a lot an autocracy, however a flexocracy. Let me present you the way I can flex my bicep as I take advantage of it to energy my fist coming into your face. That’s what it seems like.

Simply to construct on what Michelle was speaking about is we’re seeing clear violations of free speech. we’re in that territory when Ann Coulter, who’s, as she mentioned in a social media submit, that she’s for nearly each deportation. However wait a second, what’s taking place with Mahmoud Khalil seems like a transparent violation of the First Modification.

When Ann Coulter is elevating that time on this context, you recognize we’ve strayed onto some very, very attention-grabbing and harmful territory. But it surely’s so fascinating to me, Patrick and Michelle, that lots of Trump’s supporters within the center, for lack of a greater phrase, mentioned, we wish free speech. We’re bored with cancel tradition. We’re bored with the language policing on the left.

And there are reliable complaints there for absolute positive. However what we’re getting in return is just not free speech. We’re getting a special type of censorship. And we’re getting a special type of authorized speech.

And that goes again to your query, Patrick. It’s not about any coherent values. It’s not about any North Star. It’s about exhibiting that you may flip the boat 180 levels round, that you are able to do no matter you need, and you’ll deliver the individuals who opposed you and had been towards you to their knees.

Properly, and I additionally suppose free speech means one thing completely different for somebody like Elon Musk than it does for a civil libertarian. It signifies that I get to say no matter I need with out restriction, and it’s a must to hear, and it’s a must to take it. And I’m the one who has the facility to redefine phrases, not you.

And so there’s this glorying in seizing the facility that they felt the left was exercising unfairly. And for some folks, that’s what free speech was actually about. It was a couple of system of social norms that offered most grace in direction of probably the most highly effective folks in society.

On the identical time, while you discuss folks within the center, there’s additionally simply lots of people on this nation who don’t like being instructed what to say. And it’s actually attention-grabbing that one of the unpopular issues that Trump has performed, if you happen to have a look at polls, is attempt to make folks name the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America.

Michelle, I need to choose up in your level about Elon Musk. Now, I’ve been extra responsible than most in commissioning a lot of op-eds, columns on Elon Musk within the final 50 days. However I actually suppose he has been the story. He’s my choose for this primary midway level.

And it’s not simply his chainsaw for the federal government. I believe Musk is dangerous disruption personified. And I believe, greater than anybody, he’s set the tone for this administration in throwing out concepts, loopy concepts to impress and alter America.

I believe Elon Musk is at warfare with America as we all know it. I believe he sees the federal government, media, and academia as proxies for the Democratic Get together. He desires to interrupt them. He desires to redefine society as a two-gender deal.

He doesn’t like NATO. He doesn’t just like the UN. He’s all for grabbing pure assets like Greenland and earth minerals in Ukraine. He doesn’t care about allies as a result of he’s a very unilateral mindset particular person. And I get the sense he desires to interrupt the again of America, to rebuild it to his specs.

In some methods, the one who greatest understands this, as a lot as I hate to say it, is Steve Bannon, who has talked about Musk being a technofeudalist. And I do suppose that that could be a fairly correct image of the place he desires to take us.

And I additionally suppose that’s one cause why this administration has been so completely different in some methods. And it’s as a result of Trump is basically — for all his hyperactivity, he’s additionally kind of lazy and hands-off in numerous methods.

Sure. Sure. And he sees Musk as a wonderful, profitable businessman, proper?

Proper. And so the people who find themselves really working numerous the federal government day after day within the first Trump administration had been regular Republicans, a few of them who considered themselves as individuals who had been defending the federal government from Donald Trump.

And on the time, I believed that they had been doing us a disservice by propping him up and shielding the nation from the implications of electing somebody like Donald Trump as president. And I believe that this second time period has actually borne that out.

It made folks very complacent about placing such an erratic determine answerable for probably the most highly effective nation on the earth. And so now, as an alternative of them working the day-to-day operations of the federal government, it’s each a bunch of Challenge 2025 ideologues, but additionally Elon Musk and his band of feral kids with —

Folks preserve speaking concerning the feral kids, Michelle. However I see it in a different way. I consider them as world builders. I consider them as all these Tolkien type of children who need to rebuild a world within the form of Musk. And so they’re keen to drive the financial system right into a ditch if they should.

The notion that it’s all simply children working round accessing our information, and so they don’t know what they’re doing — I’m a little bit anxious that they do really know what they’re doing.

I believe it is dependent upon what you — I believe that possibly they know what they’re doing when it comes to eager to cripple the, quote, unquote, “deep state.” However why these techniques exist within the first place, I don’t suppose they perceive.

And also you see that with Musk being like, oh, we made a mistake. We fired the individuals who had been making an attempt to halt the unfold of Ebola, however then we employed them again. After all, he didn’t. None of that has been reconstructed. So really, I don’t suppose that, in lots of instances, they know what they’re doing.

Frank, can I ask you about the place Trump matches into this? As a result of I consider Trump as somebody who’s so hyperconfident, so narcissistic. He’s his personal particular person. However I believe he’s additionally taken with the concept of world constructing. I believe he very a lot desires Greenland, and he’s going to attempt to manifest that into being.

However what I don’t perceive is, is Trump his personal particular person, or like Michelle was getting at, is he type of a lazy, half-checked-out man who’s blissful to take a seat again and watch Elon and Rubio get into it, and Elon smash and seize and simply see the place it takes us, even when it takes us into an financial ditch?

Properly, it’s a little bit little bit of each. He likes to take a seat again — I believe that’s clear — and watch Musk and Rubio tangle. However he sits again figuring out that they’re tangling as a result of they’re each in his good graces in the intervening time. They’re tangling as a result of he put them in positions the place they’ve some type of energy and company and funding to tangle.

To him, a lot is a present. On the finish of that disgraceful, stunning assembly within the Oval Workplace with him, Vance, and Zelenskyy, I consider certainly one of his —

Kids, Frank. Kids.

Yeah. I consider certainly one of his ultimate feedback was — he turned to somebody and mentioned, that’ll make nice tv, huh? The importance of that remark is immense. He sees a lot of this as a spectacle.

He’s staging a spectacle for People. He’s staging a spectacle for his personal amusement. And Musk — I believe it’s attention-grabbing, Patrick, that you just keyed in on him. I believe the place he and Trump are full doppelgangers is of their understanding of energy and what ought to be performed with it.

And one of many basic modifications right here is it was, to some extent, imperfectly, in America, we noticed the measure of energy as being our grace. Our stature was mirrored in how massive and beneficiant a participant we might be on the world stage, with beneficiant being a part of the combination.

To Trump and Musk — and also you talked about Greenland — energy is acquisition. Energy is bringing individuals who disagree with you into submission. Energy is simply mainly concentrating as a lot affect and wealth round you as you’ll be able to. And that’s diametrically opposed, a minimum of to the story we used to inform ourselves about America and energy.

I discover myself each nodding alongside and likewise feeling like we simply lack the language to speak about what Trump is doing to our nation. I hear so many Democrats discuss Trump as an authoritarian or an autocrat or make comparisons to Putin.

And I simply surprise, is that sufficient to the second? Does that totally seize it? Does this man defy historic comparability or comparability on the earth stage? When folks say, properly, the check of a constitutional disaster goes to be whether or not Trump defies an order from the Supreme Courtroom, does that language even seize it?

Or is the language that I’m groping for a language a couple of nation the place so many individuals could not care whether or not Trump defies an order or not.

There’s two completely different ranges. On the one hand, is the language correct? And on the opposite, does the language meet the second or talk to folks the hazard that we’re in?

Sure.

I believe that when it comes to historic parallels, clearly none are precise, however there’s quite a bit. And, as I say in my column, I actually need to ration my Hannah Arendt references as a result of in any other case I’d simply be consistently larding my columns with citations from the origins of totalitarianism.

So it’s true that there’s a sense of profound apathy. And one of many right-wing views that I’ve possibly come round to in the middle of the final abominable decade is that we do want extra classical civic training, as a result of with out it, it’s very laborious to speak to folks why these varied limitations on the federal government and separation of powers and the like is value preserving and is value being alarmed about when it’s destroyed.

I don’t suppose there are tidy comparisons. And I believe it’s the overwhelming reality of that that’s what has so many individuals numb and tuned out and feeling helpless or simply not likely paying consideration.

To start to essentially look laborious at Trump’s indecencies, at his overreach, at his defiance of the legislation and his contempt for — I’m going to make use of the phrase “norms.” And that’s an ideal instance of how language fails us. However to begin observing that long and hard is to finish up in a black gap from which you’ll by no means escape.

And I guess you all three of us of really feel that emotionally after years of writing and speaking about this. And so I do suppose there are a lot of People who, as a result of it’s so not possible to understand, as a result of the immensity of the departure from previous presidents and from the American previous as such, that they actually find yourself concentrating all their worries on the value of eggs.

We, within the media, who’re paid to spend time excited about and analyzing all of this, certainly one of our best shortcomings is we overlook what number of People have these overstuffed, confused days wherein if they’ve half an hour to comply with the information, that’s quite a bit.

And Donald Trump and Steve Bannon — I point out him as a result of he’s the large proponent of the “flood the zone” technique — they’re relying on that. They know that.

Sure, I believe that’s proper. And so they know that numerous these folks aren’t sitting round debating the finer factors of what a constitutional disaster is. I do surprise, although, when it comes to that numbing, possibly what’s happening with the financial system will begin shaking some extra folks out of this. It’s not simply the markets.

I believe it already has to a point, across the edges. However you already see Trump’s approval score, which was constructive for the primary few weeks of his administration, is already underwater, though solely barely.

His numbers in polls on the financial system are fairly dangerous. And the data atmosphere is so dangerous that it’s not clear to me how a lot individuals are making the connection between, say, Trump saying that he can’t rule out a recession and the worth of their retirement portfolio crashing.

I believed it was a outstanding second within the final couple of days when Trump retweeted one thing or retruthed — God. One thing from —

Retruthed, Michelle!

— on his Reality Social factor. However this submit from Charlie Kirk that mentioned, shut up concerning the worth of eggs. After which mentioned, Donald Trump’s saving you cash in so many different methods.

However once more, that is probably the most tiresome pundit commentary. However think about if Joe Biden had posted “shut up concerning the worth of eggs” at a time when egg costs had been rising as quickly as they did in his administration.

Yeah, we’re listening to increasingly more from CEOs privately that they’re not investing of their companies. They’re taking part in it protected. It’s not simply the markets however the sense of this chaotic tariff coverage and the place it’s going to take folks.

We all know that Trump pays consideration to numbers. He’s obsessed along with his ballot numbers. And he’s obsessive about markets. However once more, what we had been speaking about earlier than, that want to interrupt America down —

However that’s Trump’s thought of energy. If I can destroy, if I can defile and march on comparatively unscathed and unpunished, properly, that makes me highly effective. Different folks can’t get away with that. And that’s how dominant, that’s how superior I’m.

However Michelle made a very, actually, actually vital reference a second in the past to the data atmosphere. And what I believe is so fascinating to observe proper now and probably deeply troubling — the markets aren’t doing properly. The value of eggs is just not coming down and on and on.

And there’s a widespread perception that OK, that’ll be his reckoning. People are going to see that, and so they’re going to say, no, we’d like a change, similar to we felt we wanted a change from Joe Biden.

However with such a corrupted data atmosphere and with such a dedicated demagogue within the White Home, can Trump achieve weaving a special narrative, promoting a special narrative, appointing different folks in charge, shifting the blame? Is he going to usher us into one thing that appears like a post-accountability period?

Frank, I believe the reply is sure. He does defy in so some ways what could be a standard holding to account of a frontrunner in energy. I simply by no means underestimate Donald Trump. It’s a rule of thumb of mine. By no means underestimate the person.

And a part of that’s as a result of there are such a lot of People who simply need management. And proper now, they have a look at the Democratic get together, they checked out Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. They didn’t see what they felt they wanted to see to satisfy the second politically.

What do you need to see from Democrats proper now? What does management appear like on this second that might be efficient in countering Trump, in holding him accountable?

I can provide you one very quick, simple reply. I need to see Elissa Slotkin’s response to Trump’s remarks to Congress. They had been temporary. They had been to the purpose. They didn’t indulge within the hysteria that characterizes his method to every little thing. So that they offered a distinction. And that is key, I believe. There’s an ongoing, intense argument within the Democratic Get together. Can we match his techniques with these kinds of techniques of our personal? Can we struggle fireplace with much more fireplace?

And I believe the best way you get a change, the best way you win elections, is to offer a distinction. And most of these responses to a State of the Union or to this virtually State of the Union, non-state of the Union, most of these have been fairly lame and disappointing.

And I believed the best way wherein Elissa Slotkin’s response boiled it down to a few basic American issues, talked about these in language that was plain and that had not a hint of “can’t” in it and easily mentioned, here’s what is just not being performed accurately. And we care as a lot about these points, however we’d method them in a way more efficient and commonsensical method.

I believe she gave us the reply for a way to answer Trump. And I believe possibly we’re doing an excessive amount of hand-wringing and never trying on the apparent.

So I believe her response was superb. And Elissa Slotkin could be very spectacular. However I additionally suppose that there must be a measure of management and authenticity that comes from responding to the place folks really are.

Now you’ve got hundreds of thousands and hundreds of thousands of people who find themselves so horrified, are so aghast by what’s taking place. I speak to them on a regular basis. And so they really feel like they haven’t any management. They really feel like no person is articulating what they’re feeling. And so they really feel like no person is doing something about it and telling them the place we go from right here.

These folks, they want and deserve management as a lot as people who find themselves voting based mostly on the value of eggs. And it’s simply not there. We don’t actually have an opposition get together.

Michelle, I need to learn you a letter that we received final week after our episode with David Brooks, the place David and I had been speaking about Trump’s handle to Congress, Elissa Slotkin’s response, but additionally items just like the James Carville op-ed that we had about Democrats needing to attend it out.

I heard from a lawyer in Ithaca who wrote this. “Democrats ought to wait it out? You guys apparently do not know how indignant and upset we common citizen Democrats are on the lack of motion by our elected officers. We’re beside ourselves out right here. We’re watching what’s taking place and seeing nobody in Congress doing something important to cease it.”

And he or she went on and conveyed what you had been getting at, Michelle, simply that sense of wanting somebody to guide, having somebody take some type of motion, or a minimum of lay out a plan of parents, that is how we’re going to satisfy the second, and we’re going to get by way of the second.

Can anybody chief meet it, Michelle? Do you suppose that’s attainable? One particular person, like a Bernie or an AOC?

Look, it’s most likely not going to only be one particular person. However on the identical time, there may be this political mantle simply on the market that simply as a matter of political entrepreneurship, you’ll suppose extra folks could be making an attempt to seize.

Frank, any ideas on our letter author from Ithaca?

Hear, I really feel the letter author’s ache when it comes to agreeing that this nation is in a dire place, and it’s scary as hell, and the urge for food for some kind of motion that might take us out of this as quick as attainable. I share that urge for food.

I believe Democrats don’t have numerous playing cards to play proper now. And I’d throw that into the combination. One of many issues that Democrats aren’t doing, it’s not the type of factor that you just get to elucidate in a rousing style on a podium with a microphone in entrance of you. However Democrats are combating in courts.

And a number of the most hopeful issues that we’ve seen occur are courts saying, wait a second, too quick, let’s put the brakes on this. Possibly we are able to’t let this occur. However Democrats do not need a majority in Congress. They don’t have numerous levers to tug right here.

And I believe numerous the frustration will get translated into the place is our inspiring, charismatic, spectacularly articulate chief, when actually what’s fallacious is that there aren’t numerous playing cards to play.

Michelle, Frank, thanks a lot for becoming a member of me.

Thanks.

Thanks.