Former NBA star Stephen Jackson has recently entered the arena of public opinion regarding ESPN host Stephen A. Smith, unfurling a critique that resonates deeply within the Black community. Jackson’s remarks stemmed from a controversial exchange Smith had with Alexis Ohanian, the husband of tennis icon Serena Williams, during an episode of “First Take.” The interaction showcased Smith’s unique brand of commentary that often veers into personal territories, especially when discussing Black individuals versus those of other backgrounds.
The incident occurred when Ohanian confronted Smith over his thoughts on Williams’ appearance in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show. Ohanian challenged Smith on his criticisms, questioning why he would comment on marriage, a subject he knows little about. Smith, in his defense, later addressed the awkward moment on his podcast, asserting he had “nothing” against Ohanian while maintaining his right to critique Williams.
However, Jackson was not convinced. He took to Instagram, calling out Smith for his apparent selective energy. “Come on, Stephen A., bro. You get loud and all in your feelings about Bron, when talking to a Black billionaire. But when you talking to a white billionaire, you humble,” Jackson remarked, highlighting the disparity in Smith’s interactions based on the race and status of his conversation partners. His remarks hinted at a larger issue: the differing standards applied to the empowerment and critique of Black athletes and public figures.
Jackson’s comments reflect a sentiment many have noticed: Smith’s tendency to adopt a harsher tone when discussing Black figures, particularly Black women. There’s a palpable frustration within the community regarding Smith’s treatment of high-profile individuals like Williams, Kamala Harris, and Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett. Many social media users have even begun calling for a boycott of “First Take,” emphasizing their discontent with Smith’s commentary.
Smith, for his part, attempted to clarify his comments on Williams by admitting he would feel uncomfortable if his own wife were in a similar position as Williams was during the Halftime Show. He insisted that Ohanian’s feelings were valid, given his love for Williams and their children. Yet, Jackson’s rebuttal shined a light on a disturbing trend whereby Black women’s choices and personas are scrutinized far more than their counterparts in the industry.
The ongoing discourse raises a significant question: When will the community start to protect Black women from ceaseless criticism, especially from those within their own ranks? Activist Tamika Mallory called on Black men to take a stand against Smith’s rhetoric, asking them to unite against the disrespect directed at powerful Black women. “At what point will you lead the charge to TURN HIM OFF?!?” she challenged, prompting a conversation about collective accountability.
Tiffany Cross echoed similar sentiments, expressing disappointment that Smith continues to hold sway among Black men. “Why aren’t Black men right now saying: Stephen A. Smith, we’re banning him. We’re not listening to his podcast. We’re not watching his show anymore,” she lamented. This juxtaposition of activism highlights a mounting desire for accountability within the community.
Jackson’s vocal critique of Smith is a refreshing departure from the norm, signaling that many are ready to stand against divisive commentary that harms rather than helps. As the dialogue around the treatment of Black women in media grows louder, it becomes increasingly important for influential figures to be held accountable for their words and actions, especially when they wield platforms that shape public perception.