Tory Lanez’s Appeal Denied: A Deep Dive into His Conviction
Tory Lanez, the Canadian rapper born Daystar Peterson, has faced substantial legal challenges since his conviction for shooting Megan Thee Stallion in 2020. His latest attempt to overturn that conviction hit an unexpected dead end on November 12, 2025, when the California Court of Appeals upheld both his felony convictions and a 10-year prison sentence. This ruling marks a significant moment in a controversial case that has divided fans and the public alike.
The Appeal Verdict
The court’s decision is a culmination of a long legal battle that Lanez hoped would rewrite the narrative surrounding the shooting incident. Legal journalist Meghann Cuniff reported the affirmation of Lanez’s convictions, reinforcing the sense that his fight against the legal system is far from over. His insistence on maintaining his innocence has only intensified the fervor surrounding the case, attracting a mix of supporters and detractors.
Legal Responses from Megan’s Camp
Megan Thee Stallion’s attorney, Alex Spiro, has been vocally opposing Lanez’s renewed efforts to undermine the initial conviction. He emphasized that the jury’s decision was based on substantial evidence, refuting claims made by Lanez and his team. “Tory Lanez was tried and convicted by a jury of his peers, and his case was properly adjudicated through the court system,” Spiro stated emphatically. This statement encapsulates the belief among Megan’s supporters that justice was served.
In a comprehensive 31-page report, Spiro asserted that the public should disregard “unsworn rumors being spread as fact,” pointing out that Lanez’s own admissions contributed to the overwhelming evidence against him. He vehemently criticized those attempting to divert attention from Lanez’s culpability, branding them as “foolish bullies” who should be held accountable.
Megan Thee Stallion’s Perspective
Megan has openly expressed frustration over the ongoing harassment she experiences related to the shooting. In a poignant TikTok statement, she lamented, “At what point are y’all gonna stop making me have to relive being shot BY TORY!?” Her words highlight the psychological toll the incident has taken on her, as she urged Lanez’s supporters to leave her alone.
Megan further emphasized that Lanez’s silence during the trial was intentional, noting, “HE AINT DARE GET ON THAT STAND AND DENY HE SHOT ME.” This defiance speaks volumes about her determination to stand firm in her truth, refusing to be swayed by the myriad claims from Lanez’s defenders.
The Evidence Presented at Trial
During the trial, prosecutors provided compelling evidence, including Ring camera footage and DNA analysis suggesting a significant probability that a male had fired the weapon. Forensic experts testified that there was a 90 percent likelihood the gun had been handled by a male, creating a narrative that, in many eyes, could not be disputed. Such evidence played a crucial role in convincing the jury of Lanez’s guilt.
Ongoing Legal Challenges for Lanez
The denial of Lanez’s appeal is just one chapter in his ongoing legal saga. In a recent development, a judge also barred him from avoiding a deposition in Megan’s defamation lawsuit against a blogger, Milagro Gramz. The blogger is alleged to have disseminated false information about the shooting, allegedly with Lanez’s support. Lanez’s legal team argued that the deposition could compromise his ongoing criminal appeal, but the judge was unconvinced, stating that the focus of the deposition was more on his relationships than on the shooting itself.
Community Response and Impact
The fallout from this case continues to evoke strong emotions across various communities. Fans remain polarized, with some fervently supporting Lanez and others standing by Megan. This division underscores the complexities of modern celebrity culture, where allegations of violence intersect with public narratives and personal loyalties.
As the legal battles unfold, the implications of this case extend beyond Lanez and Megan, touching on broader issues of gender-based violence and the ways in which victims are often scrutinized in the public eye.